Survey Methodology

Volume 16.

(as bibtex)

32 references.

Articles

• 105-116. Estimation using double sampling and dual stratification
  White, Donald B.
• 117-129. Sample design of the 1988 National Farm Survey
  Julien, C., Maranda, F.
• 131-136. Does the method matter on sensitive survey topics?
  Hay, David A.
• 137-143. Use of cluster analysis for collapsing imputation classes
  Langlet, E. R.
• 145-151. An example of the use of randomization tests in testing the census questionnaire
  Theberge, Alain, Beland, Yves, Béland, Yves, Théberge, Alain
• 153-163. Variance formulae for composite estimators in rotation designs
  Cantwell, Patrick J.
• 167-180. Analysis of repeated surveys
  Fuller, Wayne A.
• 181-194. Sample maintenance based on Peano keys
  Wolter, Kirk M., Harter, Rachel M.
• 195-215. The time series approach to estimation for repeated surveys
  Bell, William R., Hillmer, Steven C.
• 217-237. Robust small area estimation combining time series and cross-sectional data
  Pfeffermann, D., Burck, L.
• 239-253. A method for the analysis of seasonal ARIMA models
  Binder, David A., Dick, J. Peter
• 255-269. Spatial-temporal modelling of spatially aggregate birth data
  Brillinger, David R.
• 26-29. Comments on ``History and development of the theoretical foundations of survey based estimation and analysis''
  Smith, T. M. Fred
• 271-277. Benchmarking of economic time series
  Laniel, Normand, Fyfe, Kimberley
• 279-282. Forgot the sampling scheme at the estimation stage?
  Bandyopadhyay, Shibdas
• 283-292. Estimation of panel correlations for the Canadian Labour Force Survey
  Lee, Hyunshik
• 293-304. First wave effects in the U.S. Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey
  Silberstein, Adriana R.
• 3-25. History and development of the theoretical foundations of survey based estimation and analysis (Com: p26-29; Reply: 87-88)
  Rao, J. N. K., Bellhouse, D. R.
• 305-330. Symmetry in flows among reported victimization classifications with nonresponse
  Stasny, Elizabeth A.
• 31-46. A historical perspective on the institutional bases for survey research in the United States (Com: p47-50; Reply: p 89-90)
  Fienberg, Stephen E., Tanur, Judith M.
• 47-50. Comments on ``A historical perspective on the institutional bases for survey research in the United States''
  Groves, Robert M.
• 51-57. Contribution to statistical methodology from the U.S. federal government (Com: p58-61; Reply: p91)
  Bailar, Barbara A.
• 58-61. Comments on ``Contribution to statistical methodology from the U.S. federal government''
  Brackstone, G. J.
• 63-78. Rolling samples and censuses (Com: p72-79; Reply: 93-94)
  Kish, Leslie
• 72-79. Comments on ``Rolling samples and censuses''
  Scheuren, Fritz
• 81-86. Comments on ``History and emerging issues in censuses and surveys''
  Hansen, Morris H.
• 87-88. Reply to comments on ``History and development of the theoretical foundations of survey based estimation and analysis'' (V16 p3-25)
  Rao, J. N. K., Bellhouse, D. R.
• 89-90. Reply to comments on ``A historical perspective on the institutional bases for survey research in the United States'' (V16 p31-46)
  Fienberg, Stephen E., Tanur, Judith M.
• 91-91. Reply to comments on ``Contribution to statistical methodology from the U.S. federal government'' (V16 p51-57)
  Bailar, Barbara
• 93-94. Reply to ``Rolling samples and censuses'' (V16 p63-78)
  Kish, Leslie
• 95-98. Some developments of sampling techniques and their use in official statistics in Sweden
  Sarndal, Carl-Erik, Saerndal, Carl-Erik, Dalenius, Tore, Särndal, Carl-Erik
• 99-103. Variance estimation when a first phase area sample is restratified
  Kott, Phillip S.